<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking For Sleds In All The Wrong Places</title>
	<atom:link href="http://expertologist.net/2009/06/01/looking-for-sleds-in-all-the-wrong-places/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://expertologist.net/2009/06/01/looking-for-sleds-in-all-the-wrong-places/</link>
	<description>A blog about game design.  Mostly.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:38:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Expertologist &#187; Of Sleds and Status</title>
		<link>http://expertologist.net/2009/06/01/looking-for-sleds-in-all-the-wrong-places/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Expertologist &#187; Of Sleds and Status</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://expertologist.net/?p=319#comment-269</guid>
		<description>[...] a few months ago I wrote a post weighing in on the whole &#8220;are games art?&#8221; thing. It wasn&#8217;t exactly a new topic at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a few months ago I wrote a post weighing in on the whole &#8220;are games art?&#8221; thing. It wasn&#8217;t exactly a new topic at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://expertologist.net/2009/06/01/looking-for-sleds-in-all-the-wrong-places/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://expertologist.net/?p=319#comment-267</guid>
		<description>I also chimed in on Jones&#039; &quot;art&quot; discussion, FYI.

Howdy Chris!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also chimed in on Jones&#8217; &#8220;art&#8221; discussion, FYI.</p>
<p>Howdy Chris!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jigsaw Fanclub</title>
		<link>http://expertologist.net/2009/06/01/looking-for-sleds-in-all-the-wrong-places/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Jigsaw Fanclub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 03:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://expertologist.net/?p=319#comment-234</guid>
		<description>[...] http://expertologist.net/?p=319 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://expertologist.net/?p=319" rel="nofollow">http://expertologist.net/?p=319</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jones</title>
		<link>http://expertologist.net/2009/06/01/looking-for-sleds-in-all-the-wrong-places/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://expertologist.net/?p=319#comment-232</guid>
		<description>So I started writing a response, and ended up with 1200 words. If you like, I&#039;ll post them here, but for the moment, they&#039;re over yonder (to avoid cluttering up the comments here):

http://jigsawfanclub.com/2009/06/on-the-macguffin-of-art/

Excerpt:

You know what? Art isn&#039;t a guarantee of entertainment. The fact that I haven&#039;t seen Art on TV doesn&#039;t mean TV isn&#039;t my favorite medium. When I&#039;m deciding what movie I want to watch, Art almost never factors into the decision. I admit to giving a second chance to comics with more Artistic conceits, but I&#039;m far more excited about a new Ex Machina trade, say, than the Wolverton Bible.

The Big Lie is that something being Art automatically means you&#039;ll &lt;em&gt;like&lt;/em&gt; it. Unfortunately, when you do all the reading, listen to all the arguments, and really examine what it is that defines Art, it comes down to a weird mixture of posturing and fame.

…

Video Games don&#039;t NEED to be Art, see? They are Games. Games are for Playing. And what they need to worry about is Craft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I started writing a response, and ended up with 1200 words. If you like, I&#8217;ll post them here, but for the moment, they&#8217;re over yonder (to avoid cluttering up the comments here):</p>
<p><a href="http://jigsawfanclub.com/2009/06/on-the-macguffin-of-art/" rel="nofollow">http://jigsawfanclub.com/2009/06/on-the-macguffin-of-art/</a></p>
<p>Excerpt:</p>
<p>You know what? Art isn&#8217;t a guarantee of entertainment. The fact that I haven&#8217;t seen Art on TV doesn&#8217;t mean TV isn&#8217;t my favorite medium. When I&#8217;m deciding what movie I want to watch, Art almost never factors into the decision. I admit to giving a second chance to comics with more Artistic conceits, but I&#8217;m far more excited about a new Ex Machina trade, say, than the Wolverton Bible.</p>
<p>The Big Lie is that something being Art automatically means you&#8217;ll <em>like</em> it. Unfortunately, when you do all the reading, listen to all the arguments, and really examine what it is that defines Art, it comes down to a weird mixture of posturing and fame.</p>
<p>…</p>
<p>Video Games don&#8217;t NEED to be Art, see? They are Games. Games are for Playing. And what they need to worry about is Craft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
